Employee handbooks in a post-DEI legal landscape, Part II: Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services
By Tracy Sanders Rucker, Esq.
One of the most important employment law decisions affecting employers in recent years is Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, 605 U.S. 303 (2025).
In Ames, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously rejected the “background circumstances” test previously applied by several federal courts to so-called majority-group discrimination claims. Under that test, plaintiffs who were members of majority groups were often required to satisfy additional evidentiary burdens before proceeding with discrimination claims.
The Court held that Title VII does not support imposing different standards on different categories of plaintiffs. Writing for a unanimous Court, the Justices emphasized that Title VII protects “any individual” from unlawful employment discrimination and that the same legal standards apply regardless of the race, sex, ethnicity, or other protected characteristic of any employee. The legal implications of Ames extend well beyond litigation strategy and bolster claims of reverse discrimination.
The post-Ames era highlights employment policies that must be carefully evaluated to prohibit the appearance of providing preferences, exclusions, or employment advantages based on protected characteristics. As plaintiff attorneys increasingly rely on Ames to challenge heightened burdened discriminatory workplace practices, employers should anticipate greater scrutiny of race-based or sex-based preferences. For employers, Ames underscores the importance of reviewing employee handbook language and workplace practices to safeguard equal employment opportunities.
Employee resource groups (ERGs) remain valuable tools for promoting organizational culture. ERGs often support employee engagement, networking, professional development, mentorship, retention, and leadership development. However, recent federal enforcement and litigation trends have prompted employers to reevaluate how ERGs are funded and structured.
Legal concerns may arise when participation, leadership opportunities, mentoring programs, scholarships, sponsorships, networking opportunities, or other workplace benefits are restricted or preferentially allocated based on race, sex, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, or other protected characteristics.
For public employers, constitutional concerns may arise under Equal Protection principles when government-sponsored programs classify individuals based on protected traits such as race or sex. Many employee resource groups may use categories such as socially disadvantaged, geographically disadvantaged, or first generation rather than protected characteristics.
For public employers, “socially disadvantaged” may be deemed unlawful discrimination if it links benefit eligibility to membership in a socially disadvantaged group defined by racial, ethnic, or gender identity. For private employers, the primary legal framework remains Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related anti-discrimination laws. The concern is not the existence of ERGs specifically, but whether participation criteria or associated employment benefits create disparate treatment based on protected characteristics.
Based on the foregoing, employers are responding to these developments by emphasizing broad participation, professional development, shared interests, and business objectives that remain accessible to all employees.
Tracy Sanders Rucker, Esq. is the founder of Natural Hair and the Law, an organization dedicated to legal education about hair texture discrimination in the workplace and schools. CeriFi LegalEdge is proud to partner with Natural Hair and the Law to offer a comprehensive CROWN Act continuing legal education virtual library.
September 3, 2026
Part II of a series on how shifting DEI enforcement, executive orders, and EEOC priorities are reshaping employee handbook compliance obligations.
August 14, 2026
Part I of a series on how shifting DEI enforcement, executive orders, and EEOC priorities are reshaping employee handbook compliance obligations.
3 min read
June 16, 2026
Generative AI is no longer a novelty in legal practice. At conferences like Legalweek, the conversation has moved well beyond whether firms should pay attention to AI. The market has shifted to implementation.
3 min read
June 2, 2026
It’s hard to believe we are here already, but June 1 officially marks the beginning of Meteorological Summer. Meteorologists divide the seasons into three-month blocks throughout the year, mainly for simplification of seasonal climate tracking.
3 min read
April 30, 2026
For much of the legal profession’s early history, learning effectively stopped at licensure. Once an attorney passed the bar, there were few formal expectations to keep pace with an evolving body of law. But as the 20th century progressed—bringing rapid expansion in regulatory frameworks, corporate law, and specialized practice areas—that model began to show its limits. The law was changing faster than lawyers were.
3 min read
March 30, 2026
I’ve spent my career doing one thing: making legal ethics education worth watching. That sounds simple, but it took me two full days of mental torture to distill it into a brand statement.
3 min read
January 26, 2026
In 2025, certain CLE themes rose to the top. From AI and ethics to emerging practice areas and wellness, take a look back at the five trends that defined professional development for lawyers last year.
3 min read
January 26, 2026
In today’s legal landscape, the pivot from Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) to Merit, Excellence, and Intelligence (MEI) is reshaping how employers approach hiring, training, orientation, and termination. As employers use artificial intelligence (AI) systems to streamline employment recruitment and employee performance evaluation, a critical question emerges
2 min read
December 29, 2025
The biggest federal procurement changes since the 1984 FAR codification are reshaping government contracting — here’s how to adapt and stay prepared.
5 min read
November 19, 2025
For attorneys licensed in multiple jurisdictions, keeping up with Continuing Legal Education (CLE) requirements can feel like managing a full-time logistics project.
2 min read
October 23, 2025
The legal industry continues to evolve as firms refine their return-to-work (RTO) policies in the post-pandemic era.
2 min read
June 17, 2025
From virtual reality to on-demand video, LegalEdge Accreditation Services accredits innovative CLE formats and helps you stay compliant while leading the future of legal education.
2 min read
May 29, 2025
What Lawyers Really Want from CLE: Insights, New Courses, and a June 30 Deadline Reminder
3 min read
May 29, 2025
Here at CeriFi LegalEdge, we analyzed the tens of thousands of subscription enrollments we received in 2024 to glean some interesting insights into what our subscribers prefer.
2 min read
April 30, 2025
Paralegals are essential to the legal industry, serving as vital support professionals who help law firms, corporations, and government agencies operate more efficiently and effectively
2 min read
April 30, 2025
Supporting Legal Teams, Strengthening Skills, and Staying Ahead of What’s Next
2 min read
March 31, 2025
Grow Your Reach, Stay Compliant, and Explore CLE Like Never Before—From True Crime to Ethics and Beyond
2 min read
February 28, 2025
Build Core Skills, Track Compliance, and Explore Powerful New Tools and Partnerships on LegalEdge
2 min read
January 31, 2025
Welcoming the New Year with New Tools, Features, and a Fresh Look at CeriFi LegalEdge